[<<][staapl][>>][..]
Fri May 9 12:46:22 EDT 2014

Compiled macros

Compiled macros only work in the console as interactive command or as
"load".  This makes little sense.  Maybe all macros should be replaced
by words once they show up in the console?

What about removing the scat interpretation and replacing it with
auto-compiled macros?

What is typed at the console is either:
- a forth word
- a scheme function

If it is found to be a forth macro, the macro is compiled and
executed.  Next time it will be identified as a forth word.


So scat is still used internally to implement the macro language, but
let's remove it from the console.

It's convoluted..  The point to patch seems to be the call to `tsim`
in rpn-target.ss -- I'm commenting it out.

Trouble is: how to compile a word from that point.  I don't remember
how it all fits together.  What happens if I type ": + + ;" in the
console?


The arrows are call or macro expand, the eval is explicit.

dip40kit.dict
------> reflection.ss :: run
-eval-> rpn-target.ss :: forth-command
------> forth-lex.ss  :: forth-lex-string/cps
------> rpn-target.ss :: target>
------> rpn-target.ss :: target:
------> rpn-target.ss :: target-parse


In order to get view to the string -> sexpr representation I'm adding
a print statement in `target>`


So it +- works, but words defined at the console are not properly compiled.



[Reply][About]
[<<][staapl][>>][..]