[<<][staapl][>>][..]
Wed Mar 3 19:15:16 CET 2010

Fixing (limiting) the assembler

This needs a fix in the `tv:' form.  This is an RPN form which takes
names either from the lexical environment and lifts them as constants
or delegates to the `scat:' form.

It looks like the modification needs to be made to replace that
`scat:' form by something with a restricted functionality such that
assembler expressions can be used.

Roadmap:

  - replace tv: -> scat: delegation by something more explicit,
    i.e. with an empty namespace

  - add functionality to the new form until all uses are covered.

This might turn up some cross-connections at places..

( Ha!  With my head in the Haskell learnings lately I forgot that I
really like Scheme macros ;)

EDIT: I've been going through the code and it seems the use of tv is
really quite limited to arithmetic expressions.  And, there is already
a `partial-eval' that can pretty-print code: this is used in the repl.

Atm it seems that this can be left un-checked.  Checking can be
introduced quite directly in the `tv:' macro definition, using the
`fn-no-lex' argument to `lex-mapper'.


EDIT2: Maybe it's even simpler to combine the partial eval and other
code to using abstract evaluation, instead of explicitly.

EDIT3: Or the other way around..  Encode sytax explicitly, but tag
semantics in case evaluation is done in Scheme.  The unifying
principle is: we don't really have semantics in Scheme; the assembler
should be abstracted, so it needs an AST rep, not a functional one.

Here I miss Haskell type class polymorphism. But maybe other forms of
polymorphism can be used.  Swindle?



[Reply][About]
[<<][staapl][>>][..]