[<<][staapl][>>][..]
Tue Jul 21 12:38:10 CEST 2009

macro assembler

Going further with this: if Staapl is to be a beefed up macro
assembler speckled with application-specific local static semantics,
then it needs to be able to talk to existing assemblers.

Maybe I've been focussing on the wrong foe?  It's not C I need to
target, but machine assemblers.  It's probably best to hide the staapl
asm/dasm/sim behind an interface that can be easily implemented by
external tools.



[Reply][About]
[<<][staapl][>>][..]