[<<][staapl][>>][..]
Tue May 26 09:12:13 CEST 2009

usb.f and indexed addressing

Is this really necessary?

It is tempting to use, but it will make supporting code for PIC18
difficult.  The relative addressing is quite an extensive change.

The real problem however is that "struct" addressing needs namespace
support in the language.  This will be a bigger hurdle.

I talked about this before[1]: there is something to say about structs
vs. applications in functional programming languages.  Can we do the
same for Forth?  Use the data stack as constructing/deconstructing device?

[1] entry://20090322-215126



[Reply][About]
[<<][staapl][>>][..]