[<<][staapl][>>][..]
Sun May 10 14:26:08 CEST 2009

eta-reduction on rpn-lambda

Making abstractions with rpn-lambda with a single term at this moment
introduces abstraction overhead.  I wonder if this can lead to
memoization problems due to the fact that (macro: m) != (macro m).

To do this purely generative instead of by postprocessing requires a
different approach.  Currently the information is lost: what you want
is to fish out the function that is applied, not the application.

Maybe it isn't really a problem:  performance wise i don't think it
would matter since the compiler is probably smart enough to eliminate
the abstraction.



[Reply][About]
[<<][staapl][>>][..]