[<<][staapl][>>][..]
Wed Apr 22 23:21:42 CEST 2009

a lot of backpatching

just ran into this:

staaplc -d /dev/ttyUSB0 1220-8.f
asm-pattern: match failed for: not, asm:
[bit? #xf9e #x5 #x1]

this is because "not" is the one from coma/coma.ss

i'm using the wrong abstraction.
units are a good start, but this must be made easier to use.

small embedded programs can use a flat namespace.  building a
specialized program is really building this namespace.

also, each word should delist where its implementation comes from.
let's implement that first, then it will be clear why some
functionality won't work..



[Reply][About]
[<<][staapl][>>][..]