Fri Apr 3 20:53:12 CEST 2009
;; Code to build structured assembly code graph from forth code. This
;; uses an extension to scat's 2-stack model to represent
;; concatenative macros with a Forth-style control stack.
I'm wondering if it's possible to completely eliminate this part.
Implementing coma control on top of comp's control is maybe not the
The code in staapl/comp needs to be documented properly, or simplified
in a bottom up approach. It's ok to have fallthrough and multiple
entry, and exit points, but the way it is implemented is not quite