Fri Apr 3 20:53:12 CEST 2009


;; Code to build structured assembly code graph from forth code. This
;; uses an extension to scat's 2-stack model to represent
;; concatenative macros with a Forth-style control stack.

I'm wondering if it's possible to completely eliminate this part.
Implementing coma control on top of comp's control is maybe not the
right approach.

The code in staapl/comp needs to be documented properly, or simplified
in a bottom up approach.  It's ok to have fallthrough and multiple
entry, and exit points, but the way it is implemented is not quite