[<<][staapl][>>][..]
Fri Jun 20 00:28:30 CEST 2008

Faust

http://faust.grame.fr/

basicly what i want to do, but i don't like the syntax. makes me think
that i'm on the right track with a concatenative specification
frontend to solve the 'bussing' problem: connecting multi in/out
things..

another thing to solve when doing a dsp language like that is
block-based algorithms.

so, am i on the right way with programmable macro semantics? say i can
use a pic18 program that imports a module with a different macro
semantics that produces a static dataflow network + buffer management?

maybe i need to just write another synth to pull this thing
through. something more classic dataflow + feedback, with emphasis on
compilation to pic18 architecture.

NOTE: translating concatenative code to expressions has one advantage:
it makes usage explicit, so allocation might be simpler?



[Reply][About]
[<<][staapl][>>][..]