Sat Jul 21 10:57:54 EDT 2018
signal/next and memory/nextMemory
For Seq, does it make sense to get rid of signal and next?
No. Keep it.
So for generalizing closeProcess, it it possible to implement a
signal/next pair for that?
Here's an idea:
- only add memory/nextMemory to Seq
- for emu, keep the more general process/nextProcess
In the current implementation, it is not necessary to initialize the
processes. So let's propagate that.
Ok this is a bit simpler. Next: what should it look like at the MyHDL
side? A memory can be modeled as a register with a specific update
I think this would be it:
(m, rd) <- memory
updateMemory m (we, wa, wd, ra)