[<<][rai][>>][..]
Sun Sep 21 10:33:07 CEST 2014

Bottom up for M4F

Basically this means: represent the machine primitives and present a
bridge between those and the (fixed) rai primitives.

The interesting question here is machine mapping: replace the
assembler programmer.


So, it should be straightforward to support a M4F -> RAI prim mapping.
Is it also possible to implement the inverse in a deterministic way.
I.e. implement an instruction mapper that is guaranteed to recover
native instructions?  If this is possible, it might be a better
approach.

Required knowledge: Muchnick's chapter on peeplhole optimizers[1].

[1] http://www.amazon.com/Advanced-Compiler-Design-Implementation-Muchnick/dp/1558603204



[Reply][About]
[<<][rai][>>][..]