[<<][meta][>>][..]Wed Apr 7 00:45:30 CEST 2010
I'm a bit too tired atm for the details, but this[1] seems interesting. Got to it from LtU[2]. See also [3] and my earlier comments[4]. How would one run such a system in practice? Is it possible to build a useful _real_ machine (i.e. a small microcontroller) without the notion of program? Maybe I'm at a good point here to think really hard about these issues. I want to build a language that lets me express the audiosynth algorithms I know to derive an implementation. I want to do this without imperative notions. Possibly in a total functional language. Looks like I must be careful to not re-invent continuation- and stream-based I/O[5]. [1] http://augustss.blogspot.com/2007/08/programming-in-c-ummm-haskell-heres.html [2] http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/3893#comment [3] http://conal.net/blog/posts/can-functional-programming-be-liberated-from-the-von-neumann-paradigm/ [4] entry://../compsci/20100115-080242 [5] http://research.microsoft.com/~simonpj/papers/history-of-haskell/
[Reply][About]
[<<][meta][>>][..]