Tue Aug 11 14:06:20 CEST 2009
Let's support those by also recording the macro environment. Looks
like it's easier to first support `let' as a special form, and then
reuse that code for `letmacro'.
`let' would use an application frame, where the first value is already
filled in (a lambda created from the body). The same could be done
What would be a `lambda' where the names are bound to macros instead
of values? Maybe that's the simpler route?
Time to take a break, this is confusing..