[<<][haskell][>>][..]
Sun Mar 4 11:30:46 CET 2018

Erlang vs. Haskell BT client

Link?

hs:

+ STM: channels fit better in a typed language

+ types, refactoring easy

- space leaks require attention.

erl:

+ write app s.t. it can restart easy.  then only fix bugs that hit
  frequenly enough.  for b.t. client this was easy to do.

- no types, refactoring hard




[Reply][About]
[<<][haskell][>>][..]