[<<][erlang][>>][..]
Sat Jul 1 11:48:24 EDT 2017

Fold over erlang term?

Instead of converting an erlang term to a data structure, it makes
more sense to define a fold that is easy to use.

How do you generalize a fold over a nested data type?
Instead of one folded function which would take the place of cons, you'd have multiple.




[Reply][About]
[<<][erlang][>>][..]